Transaction · 2026

Legal due diligence for a technology acquisition

Technology acquirer

A structured legal review of a technology and services business before the acquisition decision and negotiation of the transaction agreement.

Private transaction2026
WorkspaceVirtual data room
Primary focusCustomer and partner contracts
AssetsIP, equipment and leases
DeliverableRed-flag report

01 · Starting point

What the company faced.

A buyer was evaluating a technology and services business with recurring customer relationships, strategic supplier arrangements, licences, lease commitments and operating assets. The material was extensive but inconsistently organised. The buyer needed a rapid view of the matters affecting valuation, transaction structure, warranties and pre-completion action.

02 · What we did

Concrete workstreams.

The scope below describes the public and high-level elements of the assignment.

  • Preparation of the data-room index, information request and a continuing list of missing documents.
  • Review of major customer agreements, termination rights, change of control, liability limits and recurring revenue.
  • Review of supplier, licence and partner agreements central to technical delivery.
  • Mapping of leased vehicles, rented equipment and financial commitments transferring with the business.
  • Review of corporate matters, ownership, intellectual property, employment, data protection and disputes.
  • A red-flag report with risk classification and recommendations for warranties, specific covenants and conditions precedent.

03 · Transaction path

From resolution to execution.

The principal public milestones. Each date depended on documents, reconciliations and deliverables being completed in the correct order.

  1. 01

    Request list and material structure

    The review was scoped around the deal's value drivers and the data room organised so gaps became visible.

  2. 02

    The contracts behind revenue

    Customer, supplier and licence agreements were prioritised according to economic importance and dependency.

  3. 03

    From finding to deal action

    Each material risk was linked to price, a condition precedent, a warranty or a specific covenant.

  4. 04

    Putting findings into the agreement

    The conclusions were used to prioritise SPA protections and the practical closing plan.

04 · Execution

How the process stayed aligned.

The review was risk-based rather than a document-by-document exercise without prioritisation. Material was sorted by impact on revenue, delivery capability, ownership of key assets and future cost. A live question list supported dialogue with the seller, and the red-flag report evolved as responses arrived. This allowed the buyer to make decisions and negotiate protection before every minor question had been closed.

05 · Outcome

What actually happened.

The buyer received a decision-ready summary with prioritised risks and concrete contractual actions. Findings could be carried directly into negotiations over warranties, specific covenants, disclosure and closing, reducing the risk that important matters remained isolated in a standalone report.